While I can only answer for myself on this, I'm still reluctant to declare that Iraq is void of WMD. I think it is reasonable that we should have an answer by the next presidential election. If at that time there is still no evidence of WMD, I will probably be taking a much closer look at the DNC candidate. Depending on who runs on the DNC ticket I may still vote for Bush regardless of WMD, because there are some folks I will simply never vote for.
If the DNC fails to find anyone decent and the economy is still in the toilet, and it is very obvious Bush lied about WMD, 2004 could be the year of a 3rd party winner. Its a lot of ifs, and the so-called 3rd party would really have to put forward an impeccable candidate, but more than likely we will be choosing between liar1 and liar2 again.
-Steve G.
Current Events » in reply to Okay, well then
re: Okay, well then