Firstly, you over indoctrinated freakshow, the reference was provided. That you didn’t want to look it up is your problem. You are no more a sceptic than I am Jesus Christ. Further, that you even thought to bring up the fact that I didn’t bother with html,… well,.. that’s gonna give me a good chuckle for awhile… that is too infantile to address further.

Sure, using the Iraqi representative’s claims is kinda questionable, but no more questionable than quoting any government rep from any country. Particularly considering that a super power went to war against a tiny and pathetically weak country over what is now the infamous bit out of the state of the union speech. Which, oops,… has now has proven to be categorically false. Peer reviewed publishing,… that’s good,… did ya ask for that when the hick in the white house demanded you support killing people on what he claimed? Some how I doubt it, so given the inconsistency of your standards I’m finding it pretty difficult to take ya seriously.

As to the mass graves, I’m not sure how that relates to this particular issue, unless of course you mean Bush Sr. encouraging the Iraqi people to rise up, then refusing to help them, not to mention allowing his old friend Saddam to use his attack helicopters on those pesky rebels. Oops, all dead,… oh well, more mass graves for US arrogance. Seems to me your intentional avoidance of any responsibility in such things would make you the despicable one.

If you can’t be consistent in terms of your ethical standards, take your subsequently meaningless academic standards an shove em up your ass.