A lot of people are unhappy with the president's performance. This argument seems to get turned around, that they would like to see him fail because they hate him. This is not the point though. If someone doesn't do the job, people are entitled to ask for a replacement and if enough people vote that way then Bush should go. If you were an employer how could you ever fire anyone with that kind of logic? You tell the employee he has to change and he says you are just saying that because you hate him and want him to fail. By that reasoning you can never fire the guy because it is represented as an act of hate and not a verdict of unsatisfactory performance. A lot of feminists try that one on, you can't fire them because it's discrimination since they are a woman. A lot of employers hate their workers but keep them on if they do a good job, business is business. When people want to replace Bush it's just business, they want to get someone to do a better job. The whole idea of replacing Bush seems to painted as a hate crime. Some seem to love him blindly.