I think deregulation like any economic plan only works if you keep the players honest. Making it legal to rob banks for example is not dregulation.
With and estimated 50 million Americans and Canadians left without power and in some cases water, common sense requires us to reflect on the absurdity of deregulation of public utilities. In the first case, the right of utility franchise is vested in the people. We give utilities permission to operate, and enable them to set up a profit making business in exchange for the promise of affordable and reliable service. In 1992, investor owned utilities pushed the Democratic House to pass HR776 which granted electric utilities broad powers. The bill was supposed to restructure the electric utility industry to spur competition. Utilities used deregulation to effect a series of mergers limiting competition. In order to accelerate profits, cost cutting ensued, involving the layoff of thousands of utility company employees, including some who were responsible for maintenance of generation, transmission, and distribution systems. A number of investor-owned utilities stopped investing in the maintenance and repair of their own equipment, and, instead, cut costs to enhance the value of their stock rather than spending money to enhance the value of their service.
Current Events » in reply to Unintended Consequences
Dennis Kucinich Gets a Well-Deserved Payback for Integrity from the Northeast Blackout
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Something interesting I found while browsing the CBO site...
- Bush 1 Raised Taxes Because Trickledown Didn't Work
- Yeah, I remember the allocades the Democrats gave him for that...
- Bush 1 Raised Taxes Because Trickledown Didn't Work
