IMHO your contributions are quite rigid and offer a good sounding board for opposing views.
I can't do more than say that time may prove me wrong and that's all I would ask of anyone. And Batman, this mild humility does not require you to take a greater or lesser stance on what you believe. It should serve to soften the insults to those that hold a different view.
What you persistently refer to as empirical fact and logic is to many of us nothing more than the SWAG method. You seem unable to accept that.
In spite of the "whole lot of fucking dead people" 66% of those left alive believe it was worth it. Research that.
I can't buy into your apparent belief that an equal or greater number of "fucking" dead people killed by Saddam's hand is better because the blood isn't on our hands.
I wonder how much of this moral outrage would be soothed by a Dem victory in 2004? You might get that victory but write this down, it will be the economy that determines the outcome, not GWII.
Get over it, the world is moving on but you are not.
(I could be wrong)
Current Events » in reply to There is a difference between being consistent and being bloody minded.
happy to draw you out
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Hilarious Dennis Miller Interview
- re: Hilarious Dennis Miller Interview
- Some good quotes
- To be on the Left, you have to be amazingly certain about things you’re guessing at.
- I thought the right-wing rant was...
- Will the real FrankC please stand up, please stand up
- being wrong...
- There is a difference between being consistent and being bloody minded.
- I can be wrong about anything
- Natural confusion.
- being wrong...
- To be on the Left, you have to be amazingly certain about things you’re guessing at.
