Current Events » in reply to If Bill Clinton were an addict, here's how Rush might spin it

The whole thread (23 posts)

• If Bill Clinton were an addict, here's how Rush might spin it - Don - 10/15/2003 4:48:29 AM
  • It was great untilt he part where clinton sez" I take full responsibility" - ebnelson - 10/15/2003 12:50:04 PM
  • re: If Bill Clinton were an addict - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2003 6:08:05 AM
    • Spin - Mary Anne - 10/15/2003 12:30:47 PM
      • re: Spin - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2003 4:03:05 PM
        • ZOOOM! goes the point right by Toms head - Davin L. - 10/15/2003 6:12:56 PM
          • Whoosh - ebnelson - 10/16/2003 3:15:15 AM
          • Clinton the ex-president - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2003 6:53:20 PM
            • The same song in a new verse... - Davin L. - 10/15/2003 7:46:00 PM
              • When will it end? - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2003 3:57:47 PM
                • re: When will it end? - LJ - 10/16/2003 5:06:18 PM
                  • re: When will it end? - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 1:15:04 AM
                • LMAO! My god! Either you are putting on a play, or you are just pathological on this! - Davin L. - 10/16/2003 4:35:01 PM
                  • The great liberal conceit: - ebnelson - 10/17/2003 2:09:37 AM
                    • Ah. Yes. Mr Nelson chimes in. - Davin L. - 10/17/2003 5:04:26 AM
                      • Mr. L cruises past the point - ebnelson - 10/17/2003 12:25:54 PM
                  • Hello? You paying attention at all? - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2003 5:27:49 PM
                    • Again, another post about the Clinton boogeyman... - Davin L. - 10/16/2003 8:42:51 PM
                      • Go ahead, laugh it up. - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2003 9:30:07 PM
                • Or Reagan, for that matter. Was lucid until 1998. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2003 4:02:19 PM
                  • Hummm. Sure, I'll bite Tom! I'm bored anyway - Davin L. - 10/17/2003 5:21:06 AM
                    • If Carter had been reelected, the Berlin Wall would still be there. - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2003 6:56:18 AM
                      • re: Gorbachev - Raoul - 10/17/2003 10:02:10 AM