Any critical comment about clinton's actions in the public square is mean obsession.
No, Clinton had a lot of screw ups, and had to answer for a great number of them. Thats not the point here- or it isn't outside the feverish circles of your broken-record political ideology.
Whats the point here is that even Mr. Brosz can't stop reiterating ad naseum the flaws of Clinton (for 4-or-5 posts in a row!), even when he is asked if he is merely even capable of NOT trying to make a political pont without demonizing Clinton. Even when the original subject was NOT Clinton. That point seems to have flown over your head.
Let me put it this way: stipulate Clinton is a big bad boogey-man, what the hell is your goddam point beyond that? Do you have one?
I thought so...
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to The great liberal conceit:
Ah. Yes. Mr Nelson chimes in.
The whole thread (23 posts)
- If Bill Clinton were an addict, here's how Rush might spin it
- It was great untilt he part where clinton sez" I take full responsibility"
- re: If Bill Clinton were an addict
- Spin