I don't know if you normally vote Democrat, Green, Libertarian, or Republican. The liberals on this board are not your run-of-the-mill kneejerkers. But if you vote Democrat, I would think you would be a bit concerned that this man and his tools like McCauliffe, are currently stage-managing the selection of the Democratic candidate for 2004.
If it doesn't bother you that you may end up having to vote for a sock puppet installed by a person that you yourself have expressed no admiration for, fine. I'd personally love to see Bush go up against a Clinton stand-in.
To hear you talk, you'd think that Clinton had taken up beekeeping next door to Sherlock Holmes instead of largely steering the direction of the Democratic Party.
Current Events » in reply to LMAO! My god! Either you are putting on a play, or you are just pathological on this!
Hello? You paying attention at all?
The whole thread (23 posts)
- If Bill Clinton were an addict, here's how Rush might spin it
- It was great untilt he part where clinton sez" I take full responsibility"
- re: If Bill Clinton were an addict
- Spin
