re: I can see how this might be confusing, but . . .

Current Events » in reply to Dan -- Why would the targeter make a difference?

re: I can see how this might be confusing, but . . .

D. Spires — 10/31/2003 1:30:43 AM (archived)

Tony, this is not a chat-room. If you want my opinion on something, please let me no.

By your definition, surely only the intended target makes the case for active resistance/terrorism?

For the record, I do not supply â€œdefinitionsâ€, other than those found within a reviewed dictionary, but I believe that life and death are both far more complicated than your little analogy of me allows.

And now, our 20-questions session is over.

Cheers,
Dan

The whole thread (28 posts)

Of traitors, and wilful ignorance - LJ - 10/28/2003 5:19:33 PM
- ****, this one's simple - E.P. Grondine - 10/29/2003 10:46:50 PM
- Oh yes! Please try to be sensitive and feel my pain, you callous Americans brutes! n/t (n/t) - Osama - 10/29/2003 3:18:14 AM
- re: Of traitors, and wilful ignorance - ebnelson - 10/29/2003 2:14:55 AM
- re: "We are creating the next generation of terrorists . . ." - D. Spires - 10/28/2003 8:52:09 PM
  - It isn't terrorism if you are attacking an armed military target - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2003 10:12:01 PM
    - re: Legally true . . . - D. Spires - 10/28/2003 10:14:23 PM
      - re: Whoops . . . - D. Spires - 10/28/2003 10:21:59 PM
        
        Trouble with definitions is there is still a gradation between the two - Tony - 10/30/2003 12:31:51 PM
        
        re: Hardly a 'gradation' . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2003 10:00:29 PM
        
        No and no. BTW, those were real, not hypothetical (n/t) - Tony - 10/30/2003 10:15:46 PM
        
        re: Tony -- targeted by whom . . . ? (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/30/2003 11:17:10 PM
        
        Dan -- Why would the targeter make a difference? - Tony - 10/31/2003 12:57:45 AM
        
        re: I can see how this might be confusing, but . . . - D. Spires - 10/31/2003 1:30:43 AM
        
        You asked a question. I answered. Sorry to confuse you. (n/t) - Tony - 10/31/2003 3:43:08 PM
- re: Of traitors, and wilful ignorance - Marcia - 10/28/2003 7:37:51 PM
  - re: wilful ignorance - Raoul - 10/28/2003 10:40:13 PM
    - re: :^) . . . - D. Spires - 10/29/2003 12:48:01 AM
      - re: re:Fear - Raoul - 10/29/2003 5:23:50 PM
        
        re: Fear: Or equals Al Quaida, Taliban & Co. (whatever way you want to sepell it.) - Marcia - 10/30/2003 4:07:23 AM
        
        re: Exactly! - Raoul - 10/30/2003 5:22:46 PM
        
        re: It is already shown that vigilance = success . . . - D. Spires - 10/30/2003 9:53:12 PM
        
        re: Yes, that should be 'spell it' (as in like it is). (n/t) - Marcia - 10/30/2003 4:10:11 AM
        
        re: Yeah, Raoul, we're all being terrorized over here . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 10/29/2003 9:33:29 PM
      - re: :^) . . . - ebnelson - 10/29/2003 2:45:57 AM
        
        re: The flaw . . . - D. Spires - 10/29/2003 5:37:47 AM
- trying to understand - FrankC - 10/28/2003 7:28:10 PM
  - Exactly. - ebnelson - 10/29/2003 2:17:21 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (28 posts)