Its that you are like some sort of caricature of a person trying to make a point in a very poor and illiterate fashion- you somehow manage to confuse abusive language and abuse of languange into one completely and remarkably nonsensical package. You don't have a point or anything constructive to say beyond "you suck, I hate you and I sound like I'm drunk", but you want to try to participate in discussions on CE anyway... So in every thread there is this cognitive bowel movement from you tacked after every third post. Its like that kid on the Simpsons whose interjection into every discussion is: "My Cats breath smells like tuna"- except its just offensive noise that you spew.
The only way you actually aspire towards having a point is to tack some idiotic and insulting "me too, and they [liberals] suck!" after any post by posters more literate than yourself.
I'd take this over to flame and post it there- but why bother? Nobody can tell the difference between YOUR posts at flame and your posts on CE... Frankly- I'm sick of having to wade through your crap. Justin and Robert might as well write a script that shunts all posts from your dotted quad or bearing the string 'nelson' over to the flame board.
Hell, you can't even be civil and make a point in your subject lines. Why don't you just replace all your titles with a string of four letter words and get it over with? If you have something to Say Ed, why not just SAY it? If all you have to say is "I hate you all, you effing liberals", then why not just opo onto CE once a month, and stick a post saying just that on and then let us be?
Do you notice that not even the people you agree with entertain your posts? The only response you get is when people want to play 'kick the chihuahua' and spam vitriol back at you.
I'm done. I can go back to ignoring you for another few months, and then we'll go back through this again.
Current Events » in reply to When you clowns have to pick on typos
Its not about your typos Ed
The whole thread (62 posts)
- Spain has spoken
- Defiance
- re: A solid victory for terror everywhere . . . (n/t)
- re: Spain has spoken
- Perhaps the Spaniards believe their government shoulda concentrated on AQ instead of Iraq. (n/t)
- If Spain chooses apeasement, they are saying more than they may realize
- Laugh it up, pal. Maybe you don't realize what just happened in Spain. (n/t)
- re: Yes, it's called democracy! (n/t)
- Pray, tell.
- The conservatives nightmare - a fair vote in a democracy? (n/t)
- And you defend Castro
- Fair?
- Cause - effect. (Posted to the wrong board the first time.)
- Until the bombing, the conservative Popular Party was projected by most polls to beat the Socialists, although perhaps without retaining their majority in the 350-seat Congress of Deputies.
- The Spanish government backed the US-led invasion of Iraq last year despite polls showing 90% opposition to it from the Spanish public.
- I know you're not saying that they should forgo the voting and stick with the polls.
- Link
- Until the bombing, the conservative Popular Party was projected by most polls to beat the Socialists, although perhaps without retaining their majority in the 350-seat Congress of Deputies.
- Cause - effect. (Posted to the wrong board the first time.)
- Follow-up election scheduled on issue of handing Spain back to the Moorish invaders
- re: Spain has spoken