re: What's more likely?

Current Events » in reply to What's more likely?

SteveS — 6/26/2004 1:26:14 AM (archived)

Heck, Bush wouldn't have had the slightest idea as to this "connection" when he was lying. This only came later, and is the best they can do to try to establish one.

Came later?

The Clinton administration talked about firm evidence linking Saddam Hussein's regime to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network years before President Bush made the same statements.

Source

SteveS

The whole thread (15 posts)

NYT gets it wrong...NAW! - FrankC - 6/25/2004 10:38:12 PM
- What's more likely? - Bowser - 6/25/2004 11:58:38 PM
  - re: What's more likely? - SteveS - 6/26/2004 1:26:14 AM
    - That's funny. - Bowser - 6/26/2004 3:36:45 AM
      - That's what Gore said too - SteveS - 6/26/2004 4:28:04 AM
  - Slender threads - FrankC - 6/26/2004 12:45:19 AM
    - Hmmm. Let's see if I'm getting this. - Bowser - 6/26/2004 4:16:27 AM
      - Americans have been blind-sided - Lindy - 6/27/2004 4:07:51 PM
      - Incorrect - FrankC - 6/26/2004 5:04:08 AM
        
        re:As if.. - Raoul - 6/26/2004 8:55:34 AM
        
        Ah, analogy - FrankC - 6/26/2004 3:06:54 PM
        
        re: Ah, analogy - Raoul - 6/27/2004 8:55:35 AM
        
        So GWB DID say WTC was a reason to invade Iraq? - Bowser - 6/26/2004 5:23:36 AM
        
        He specifically said... - FrankC - 6/26/2004 3:35:14 PM
- Funny, I find it more disturbing that our press lies than the possibility that our president does. (n/t) - RobVG - 6/25/2004 11:11:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)