So GWB DID say WTC was a reason to invade Iraq?

Bowser — 6/26/2004 5:23:36 AM (archived)

Are you are saying that GWB admits Iraq had nothing to do with WTC, AND

GWB says Iraq needed to be invaded because WTC happened?

(Why didn't he say that Saudi Arabia needed to be invaded, since Saudis caused WTC?)

May as well get this straight before putting in much more effort.

Arf

The whole thread (15 posts)

NYT gets it wrong...NAW! - FrankC - 6/25/2004 10:38:12 PM
- What's more likely? - Bowser - 6/25/2004 11:58:38 PM
  - re: What's more likely? - SteveS - 6/26/2004 1:26:14 AM
    - That's funny. - Bowser - 6/26/2004 3:36:45 AM
      - That's what Gore said too - SteveS - 6/26/2004 4:28:04 AM
  - Slender threads - FrankC - 6/26/2004 12:45:19 AM
    - Hmmm. Let's see if I'm getting this. - Bowser - 6/26/2004 4:16:27 AM
      - Americans have been blind-sided - Lindy - 6/27/2004 4:07:51 PM
      - Incorrect - FrankC - 6/26/2004 5:04:08 AM
        
        re:As if.. - Raoul - 6/26/2004 8:55:34 AM
        
        Ah, analogy - FrankC - 6/26/2004 3:06:54 PM
        
        re: Ah, analogy - Raoul - 6/27/2004 8:55:35 AM
        
        So GWB DID say WTC was a reason to invade Iraq? - Bowser - 6/26/2004 5:23:36 AM
        
        He specifically said... - FrankC - 6/26/2004 3:35:14 PM
- Funny, I find it more disturbing that our press lies than the possibility that our president does. (n/t) - RobVG - 6/25/2004 11:11:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)