Jason's blog hit all the right buttons first.
With the very public problems the traditional media have had with a few well-publicized cases of journalistic fraud, and the anonymous nature of the internet, blogging looks like a whisper campaign waiting to happen. Blogging is no more immune to exaggeration and outright fraud than any other form of journalism.
I don't want to condemn blogs or censor them. (Ask anyone here how I react to censorship.) But as someone who acts as the interface between the information industry and information seekers, and especially since most of my customers are children, I find it vital to be able to establish who is reliable and who is not, both when I supply sources and when I teach how to evaluate them.
With opinion, it's easy: check the links. I don't check them all, mind you, but I do go through a sizable minority.
With reporting in its many forms, as with non-fiction in general, the biggest check is the identity of the writer. It's not so easy to check this anymore.
I find your idea of a kind of blog editorial board, the Better Business Bureau of Bloggers, very encouraging. If I have to endure character assassination by groupies every time I express doubt about a blogger with holes in his pedigree, I will avoid recommending them at all. It's not worth the aggravation. Having a kind of clearinghouse regulated by bloggers would be a positive step.
The message in and of it self is neither true or untrue because of the messenger.
In general, yes. If a messenger makes things up to support his message, e.g., "we are dying of plague because the Jews have poisoned the well", we'll have a problem.
How quickly we accept the message might be, depending on our comfort with the messenger for good or for ill.
Accept, reject, whatever. The important thing is to be able to discuss the message with confidence. If everything is entertainment, and the news can be staged and scripted as a matter of course --something we're struggling with right now -- we can kiss democracy goodbye.
Thank you for taking this concern seriously.
Regards--
Mary Anne
Current Events » in reply to re: It's not so much the address as the type of address
This whole blogger authority thing has been on my mind for a while.
The whole thread (74 posts)
- Mainstream media bias, nailed to the wall.
- Headlines
- Who is Jason?
- re: Who is Jason?
- Who does he have to be?
- re: Who does he have to be? Identifiable.
- Kind of off the main topic
- BTW...
- Interesting. No outfit name?
- His e-mail address is right there. Write him a letter.
- Jeez, Tom, I have four emails, but only one is traceable.
- re: Jeez, Tom, I have four emails, but only one is traceable.
- re: Jeez, Tom, I have four emails, but only one is traceable.
- Fine. Have it your way. The man is imaginary.
- Jeez, Tom, I have four emails, but only one is traceable.
- His e-mail address is right there. Write him a letter.
- Interesting. No outfit name?
- Neil Boortz
- re: Maybe the Mainstream Media don't want to touch it because they don't know for sure were the lie is...
- As Tim Blair put it...
- ....and then there is this, .........
- Then there's this...
- re: Mainstream media bias, nailed to the wall.
- The infotainment media is fighting for its political life
