Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to It still would not be a pure democracy

It's hard to get over 50% of the vote if there's a strong 3rd party

Clinton never got over 50% of the popular vote, but he clearly won his elections, especially in the Electoral College. The campaign for president is way too long already (starts over a year before the election). Making people put up with a runoff election is more than a lot of people could stomach.

According to some reports, there were from several hundred thousand to perhaps a million+ votes that were not counted in the 2000 election. On average, some 2% of votes are invalid, so the number could be well over a million spoiled votes.

If we went to a nationwide popular vote to elect the president, then vote fraud like what happened in Wisconsin (college students admitted voting fraudulently and hobos were paid in cigarettes to vote for Gore), St Louis (judge ordered polling booths to stay open well after closing time to give more time to stuff the ballots), and other places would be even more profitable. As it is, someone bent of fraud has to manipulate several state elections to have an effect (like what happened in 1960). With a nationwide popular vote, the effects of fraud could be more easily covered by corrupting a few percentage of votes in many places.

The system isn't perfect, but it isn't as broken as some claim.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (29 posts)