Mark wrote:
You are an idiot if you don't fear another 911 or worse. Handwaiving away the threat as Clinton did for 7 years paying minimal attention to it is gross negligence after 9/11. Kerry has not proposed anything other than Clinton policy retreads that already failed. I don't care how bad Bush is on domestic policy I will not vote for such foreign policy incompetance again.
A policy of appeasing the coalition of the bribed is far worse than fearing real threats.
As I said you operate in fear not in reason. Bush has f**ked up royally. He methods are no better than Clinton's. His preemptive attack on Iraq was a mistake and instead of admitting this he changes the reasons he sent our troops in! Sadly it will take another terrorist attack (possibly nuclear) here in the USA for you to get how f**ked up his administration is! He has wasted time and resources (people) in Iraq and instead of working to remove nukes from the black market he sits on his hands. If you vote for Bush you are the scared idiot Mark. I note you made no comments about the nuclear threat thread I started How to Stop Nuclear Terror By Graham Allison (but then non of you on the right did).
Try reading this:
Uncovering the Nuclear Black Market: Working Toward Closing Gaps in the International Nonproliferation Regime
Current Events » in reply to Get Something Straight
re: You do change horses in mid-stream if your mount is dead!
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Who is spreading fear, Dick and George? Cheney: Threatens Terrorists May Bomb U.S. Cities
- Kerry Supporter's Stance In A Nutshell
- The candidate of Hamas, North Korea and France promises to talk firmly to anyone who attacks us. Kerry is definitely the scary one. (n/t)
- re: Ever choosing to lie before telling any truth now, Ed? Please show us where Kerry said he would "talk firmly" over punishing terror with attack, even preemptive attack? (n/t)
- Were you awake during Kerry's acceptance speech? All he promised was a firm response. (n/t)
- From his acceptance speech: I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President. Let there be no mistake: I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will… (n/t)
- So we can agree, at lzast: He will respond after we are attacked. He will not try and stop an attack prior to it happening.
- He defended this country as a young man? But I thought he said Vietnam was wrong?
- From his acceptance speech: I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President. Let there be no mistake: I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will… (n/t)
- Were you awake during Kerry's acceptance speech? All he promised was a firm response. (n/t)
- re: Ever choosing to lie before telling any truth now, Ed? Please show us where Kerry said he would "talk firmly" over punishing terror with attack, even preemptive attack? (n/t)
- We will lose a city to terrorism if Kerry wins
- re: You are a perfect example of a person running on fear. Cheney admits nothing pervents us losing a city on the Bush and his watch either! (n/t)
- The Difference Is
- re: God you're dense! Bush's best is complete ineptitude. Be my guest vote in fear so many others will be doing. Bush and Cheney sure know you folks well. (n/t)
- You & Kerry Are Living In Fantasyland
- re: Well you clearly are living in Bush's Fairyland. The absence of an attack doesn't prove anything. That you are not use rational thought is evident in most of your posts here. Thinking in fear mak…
- It's interesting how decent people get killed through good intentions
- You & Kerry Are Living In Fantasyland
- re: God you're dense! Bush's best is complete ineptitude. Be my guest vote in fear so many others will be doing. Bush and Cheney sure know you folks well. (n/t)
- The Difference Is
- re: People are in denial.
- re: You are a perfect example of a person running on fear. Cheney admits nothing pervents us losing a city on the Bush and his watch either! (n/t)
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion
- History indicates that prevention is cheaper than cure. Kerry promises to react. He is favored by the terrorists. Think about it, if you can. (n/t)
- You need to study the Middle East some more
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion