FANTASYLAND. His comments with regard to the UN and France are recycling of failed Clinton policies. In the debate Kerry was against the 6 party talks that include the government preventing NK's collapse. No one has more leverage than China and the idiot Kerry wants to cut them out. 150,000 terrorists? That's our troop level Chris. You are obviously either very confused or swallowing a boatload of swill.
Kerry claims he can do all kinds of things Chris. Claiming such is easy. Doing it is hard. Since I know half of what he claims he will do is BS based on promoting already failed policies I have no reason to believe anything he says. And before you bring up Bush's many failures, they occured after he accomplished things Clinton never did by pursuing policies Kerry wants to return to.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to re: Wrong Bush is clearly dead not lame. It isn't clear at all Kerry will be DOA.
Yes He Just Needs To Sprinkle Fairy Dust On Clinton's Failed Policies
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Who is spreading fear, Dick and George? Cheney: Threatens Terrorists May Bomb U.S. Cities
- Kerry Supporter's Stance In A Nutshell
- The candidate of Hamas, North Korea and France promises to talk firmly to anyone who attacks us. Kerry is definitely the scary one. (n/t)
- re: Ever choosing to lie before telling any truth now, Ed? Please show us where Kerry said he would "talk firmly" over punishing terror with attack, even preemptive attack? (n/t)
- Were you awake during Kerry's acceptance speech? All he promised was a firm response. (n/t)
- From his acceptance speech: I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President. Let there be no mistake: I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will… (n/t)
- So we can agree, at lzast: He will respond after we are attacked. He will not try and stop an attack prior to it happening.
- He defended this country as a young man? But I thought he said Vietnam was wrong?
- From his acceptance speech: I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President. Let there be no mistake: I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will… (n/t)
- Were you awake during Kerry's acceptance speech? All he promised was a firm response. (n/t)
- re: Ever choosing to lie before telling any truth now, Ed? Please show us where Kerry said he would "talk firmly" over punishing terror with attack, even preemptive attack? (n/t)
- We will lose a city to terrorism if Kerry wins
- re: You are a perfect example of a person running on fear. Cheney admits nothing pervents us losing a city on the Bush and his watch either! (n/t)
- The Difference Is
- re: God you're dense! Bush's best is complete ineptitude. Be my guest vote in fear so many others will be doing. Bush and Cheney sure know you folks well. (n/t)
- You & Kerry Are Living In Fantasyland
- re: Well you clearly are living in Bush's Fairyland. The absence of an attack doesn't prove anything. That you are not use rational thought is evident in most of your posts here. Thinking in fear mak…
- It's interesting how decent people get killed through good intentions
- You & Kerry Are Living In Fantasyland
- re: God you're dense! Bush's best is complete ineptitude. Be my guest vote in fear so many others will be doing. Bush and Cheney sure know you folks well. (n/t)
- The Difference Is
- re: People are in denial.
- re: You are a perfect example of a person running on fear. Cheney admits nothing pervents us losing a city on the Bush and his watch either! (n/t)
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion
- History indicates that prevention is cheaper than cure. Kerry promises to react. He is favored by the terrorists. Think about it, if you can. (n/t)
- You need to study the Middle East some more
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion