I stand by my earlier comments as well. Stop with the Democratic style false accusations crap Chris. Bush's tactics are obviously better than Clinton's. Clinton did squat. The fact that Bush has made many errors in trying to do something doesn't equate with Clinton's lack of action or Kerry's support for the same type of lame do nothing policies. If the Democrats nominated someone with a credible plan for the future and "I would haves" not based on fantasy they would be winning easily now. Only the Bush deranged believe the crap Kerry spouts on Iraq.
Bush errors in Iraq do not mandate believing that France has any relevance to helping in Iraq. Nore do they mandate forgetting that France undercut sanctions on Iraq over the last 10 years. Nore do they mandate forgetting that Clinton allowed inspectors to be kicked out of Iraq with no effective response. Bush errors do not justify insulting the allies we have in favor of allies that have proved unreliable over and over. Bush errors are not responsible for Kerry changing his Iraq position based on whatever interest group he is currently courting. Bush errors do not justify insulting the Iraqis trying to bring democracy to Iraq. Kerry is absolutely full of crap on Iraq. I'll take someone pursuing the right objective on the occasionally wrong course over someone who has no objective or the wrong objective anyday.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to re: You do change horses in mid-stream if your mount is dead!
No, I'm Responding To Your Comment
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Who is spreading fear, Dick and George? Cheney: Threatens Terrorists May Bomb U.S. Cities
- Kerry Supporter's Stance In A Nutshell
- The candidate of Hamas, North Korea and France promises to talk firmly to anyone who attacks us. Kerry is definitely the scary one. (n/t)
- re: Ever choosing to lie before telling any truth now, Ed? Please show us where Kerry said he would "talk firmly" over punishing terror with attack, even preemptive attack? (n/t)
- Were you awake during Kerry's acceptance speech? All he promised was a firm response. (n/t)
- From his acceptance speech: I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President. Let there be no mistake: I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will… (n/t)
- So we can agree, at lzast: He will respond after we are attacked. He will not try and stop an attack prior to it happening.
- He defended this country as a young man? But I thought he said Vietnam was wrong?
- From his acceptance speech: I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President. Let there be no mistake: I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will… (n/t)
- Were you awake during Kerry's acceptance speech? All he promised was a firm response. (n/t)
- re: Ever choosing to lie before telling any truth now, Ed? Please show us where Kerry said he would "talk firmly" over punishing terror with attack, even preemptive attack? (n/t)
- We will lose a city to terrorism if Kerry wins
- re: You are a perfect example of a person running on fear. Cheney admits nothing pervents us losing a city on the Bush and his watch either! (n/t)
- The Difference Is
- re: God you're dense! Bush's best is complete ineptitude. Be my guest vote in fear so many others will be doing. Bush and Cheney sure know you folks well. (n/t)
- You & Kerry Are Living In Fantasyland
- re: Well you clearly are living in Bush's Fairyland. The absence of an attack doesn't prove anything. That you are not use rational thought is evident in most of your posts here. Thinking in fear mak…
- It's interesting how decent people get killed through good intentions
- You & Kerry Are Living In Fantasyland
- re: God you're dense! Bush's best is complete ineptitude. Be my guest vote in fear so many others will be doing. Bush and Cheney sure know you folks well. (n/t)
- The Difference Is
- re: People are in denial.
- re: You are a perfect example of a person running on fear. Cheney admits nothing pervents us losing a city on the Bush and his watch either! (n/t)
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion
- History indicates that prevention is cheaper than cure. Kerry promises to react. He is favored by the terrorists. Think about it, if you can. (n/t)
- You need to study the Middle East some more
- re: terrorists could bomb US cities if we drop Bush's policy of pre-emtion