I agree 100% Bush did a poor job of articulating reasons for the most part. However contrary to Democratic revisionism he did try and articulate reasons other than wmd and he certainly gave Saddam plenty of time to live up to his UN obligations after he made it clear he was willing to go to war to enforce the sanctions. While the rational and relationship to GW1 may have not been clearly stated it was clearly implied by the comply or else stance. Bush did not go to war over the possibility of wmd alone. It was the possibility of WMD AND Saddam's refusal to abide by the conditions the UN put on him after GW1 to assure the world that he was no longer a WMD threat. Bush also had his team spend considerable time and effort to get 1441 passed. Saddam's own intransigence was the biggest misleading piece of evidence for a wmd program.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to re: Yes & No
Bush Couldn't Articulate His Way Out Of A Paper Bag
The whole thread (42 posts)
- It was never about WMD... A glimpse at history
- I guess a lot of you would like to forget your real reasons for war...
- I Beleive The Correct Phrase IS "It was never ONLY about WMD"
- painful (n/t)
- Fantastic - I liked the one about waving flags! (n/t)
- re: It was never about WMD... A glimpse at history
- re: "Most likely: explosive booby traps, bombing of civilian areas to take out our forces..."
- "Other than the poison gas, I think I came out pretty good on this one."
- $80 billion more requested for this war to protect ourselves from WMD
- I was talking about my prediction
- re:LOL !! (n/t)
- That....
- What ever happened to Matt B. Anyways? (n/t)
- re: It was never about WMD... it was about control of the 2nd largest oil reserve in the world.
- re: It was never about WMD... A glimpse at history
