Current Events » in reply to Like all nuclear power technology, it will NOT be economically viable.

The whole thread (54 posts)

• China to make commerical use of the graphite ball reactor - Gary - 2/8/2005 7:26:53 AM
  • Here is a link on this. - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 10:54:46 PM
  • Like all nuclear power technology, it will NOT be economically viable. - David F Mayer - 2/8/2005 3:30:08 PM
    • David - ebnelson - 2/9/2005 10:58:07 PM
    • Don't know where you get that idea. - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 4:10:20 PM
      • Breeder reactors and nuclear energy economics - Gary - 2/8/2005 5:03:00 PM
        • re: nuclear energy economics, and eating France's dust - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 5:30:40 PM
          • France's reactors are operated at a huge loss, made up by subsidies. - David F Mayer - 2/8/2005 5:55:19 PM
            • You got a source for that? - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 6:11:29 PM
              • Try these - David F Mayer - 2/8/2005 6:32:33 PM
                • Subsidies - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 8:15:06 PM
                  • You are simply mistaken. - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 12:14:56 AM
                  • Can't believe you are using DFM as a strawman leftist. LOL! (n/t) - alcaray - 2/8/2005 9:59:10 PM
                    • Gee, where did I mention "left?" - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 10:42:30 PM
                      • My bad. Should have read: environmentalist strawman. (n/t) - alcaray - 2/8/2005 11:32:40 PM
                        • No problem. It's very easy to confuse them. ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 1:48:53 AM
                          • Does it make me a racist if I say: - alcaray - 2/10/2005 10:12:08 PM
                            • Strawmen? - Tom Brosz - 2/10/2005 10:15:53 PM
                              • Just continuing your joke. Or, I thought it was a joke... (n/t) - alcaray - 2/10/2005 11:31:29 PM
                          • Huh? (n/t) - Confused Broszian Strawman - 2/9/2005 3:51:42 AM
                            • Rewrite: "No problem. It's very easy to confuse the two categories." (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 6:40:26 AM
                              • Oh.... I get it.... I think ..... (n/t) - Just Typically Stupid Boszian Strawman - 2/9/2005 8:12:22 PM
                  • P.S. - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 8:18:35 PM
      • my only concern - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 4:22:01 PM
        • It's my understanding... - Gary - 2/8/2005 5:14:51 PM
          • Thanks - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 5:27:00 PM
            • Google is your friend (n/t) - Gary - 2/8/2005 5:36:19 PM
              • Indeed it is - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 6:30:12 PM
                • Sorry, I didn't wish to seem rude - Gary - 2/9/2005 8:27:01 AM
        • re: my only concern - Tom Brosz - 2/8/2005 4:48:48 PM
          • Then there is the safety problem with all graphite moderated reactors. - David F Mayer - 2/8/2005 5:53:05 PM
            • re: graphite moderated reactors. - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 6:36:59 PM
              • I simply DO NOT BELIEVE IT. - David F Mayer - 2/8/2005 7:46:25 PM
                • re: I simply DO NOT BELIEVE IT. - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 8:03:33 PM
                  • I STILL DO NOT BELIEVE IT. - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 12:17:44 AM
                    • News flash, David: Reality doesn't give a damn WHAT you BELIEVE!! - R.L. - 2/10/2005 4:08:35 PM
                    • Well, okay, believe what you want - Davin :. - 2/9/2005 12:31:22 AM
                      • "Its not absurd to believe that simple radiant heat loss could cool the pile." Into WHERE? - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 12:44:03 AM
                        • from the capsule exchanging heat into the surrounding medium - Davin :. - 2/9/2005 1:09:07 AM
                          • Air + graphite at 2600 C means BIG FIRE. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 1:23:14 AM
                            • Pyrolytic graphite = missile nose cones, rocket nozzle throats - Gary - 2/9/2005 8:22:42 AM
                              • re: Pyrolytic graphite = missile nose cones, rocket nozzle throats - Ribrin - 6/2/2005 6:18:27 PM
                              • Good Stuff! - Davin :. - 2/9/2005 5:08:04 PM
                              • Afterheat - David F Mayer - 2/9/2005 1:58:43 PM
                                • You clearly dont know what you are talking about- as usual... - R.L. - 2/9/2005 10:10:23 PM
                            • David, maybe this is the confusion - Davin L. - 2/9/2005 3:43:16 AM
                              • One source - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2005 4:05:22 PM
                                • PS - Davin :. - 2/9/2005 11:56:40 PM
                                • Tom, that link was out of the park! - Davin :. - 2/9/2005 11:55:50 PM
                                  • The truth is out there... - Tom Brosz - 2/10/2005 4:28:37 AM
                            • Assuming Oxygen - Davin :. - 2/9/2005 3:32:35 AM
                              • correction - Davin L. - 2/9/2005 3:35:04 AM
          • Thanks for the info (n/t) - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 5:27:49 PM
  • Cheap energy is one of the most important parts of being a super power - ebnelson - 2/8/2005 1:40:10 PM