Refer to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor
Key quote:
Pyrolytic graphite is the main structural material in these pebbles. It melts at 3000°C, more than twice the design temperature of most reactors. It slows neutrons very ably, is strong, inexpensive, and has a long history of use in reactors. Its strength and hardness come from anisotropic crystals of carbon. Pyrolytic graphite is also used, unreinforced, to construct missile reentry nose-cones and large solid rocket nozzles. It is nothing like the powdered mixture of flakes and waxes in pencil leads or lubricants.
Some authorities believe that pyrolytic graphite can burn in air, and cite the famous accidents at Windscale and Chernobyl—both graphite-moderated reactors. Others insist that it cannot. Of course, all pebble-bed reactors are cooled by inert gases that prevent fire. However, all pebble designs also have at least one layer of silicon carbide that serve as a fire break, as well as a seal.
----- end quote -----
Comparing the graphite used in a graphite ball reactor to the graphite in the Chernobyl reactor is scare tactics. The pyrolytic graphite used for the graphite balls is similar to what is used for spacecraft thermal protection systems and rocket nozzle throats. Also the reactor core is pressurized with helium at 8.4 MPa (84 bars). If there is a loss of coolant accident then the helium will lose temperature as it undergoes isentropic expansion (think evaporator heat exchanger in an air conditioner). This drop in temperature would also help to cool the graphite balls and is part of the system's passive safety.
Gary
Current Events » in reply to Air + graphite at 2600 C means BIG FIRE.
Pyrolytic graphite = missile nose cones, rocket nozzle throats
The whole thread (54 posts)
- China to make commerical use of the graphite ball reactor
- Here is a link on this.
- Like all nuclear power technology, it will NOT be economically viable.
- David
- Don't know where you get that idea.
- Breeder reactors and nuclear energy economics
- re: nuclear energy economics, and eating France's dust
- France's reactors are operated at a huge loss, made up by subsidies.
- re: nuclear energy economics, and eating France's dust
- my only concern
- It's my understanding...
- re: my only concern
- Then there is the safety problem with all graphite moderated reactors.
- re: graphite moderated reactors.
- I simply DO NOT BELIEVE IT.
- re: I simply DO NOT BELIEVE IT.
- I STILL DO NOT BELIEVE IT.
- News flash, David: Reality doesn't give a damn WHAT you BELIEVE!!
- Well, okay, believe what you want
- "Its not absurd to believe that simple radiant heat loss could cool the pile." Into WHERE?
- I STILL DO NOT BELIEVE IT.
- re: I simply DO NOT BELIEVE IT.
- I simply DO NOT BELIEVE IT.
- re: graphite moderated reactors.
- Thanks for the info (n/t)
- Then there is the safety problem with all graphite moderated reactors.
- Breeder reactors and nuclear energy economics
- Cheap energy is one of the most important parts of being a super power
