"So you're also going to take the line that nobody in the Democratic Party or liberal pundits blamed Bush's policies for the fact that North Korea was hell-bent on pursuing nuclear weapons? That Bush's "hostility" forced their hand?"
Me: I dont take that line at all.
apologies for actually answering your question.
As for Bush - sure he is at fault, as is Clinton for not having better verification procedures (though that may be due to the fairly uselss NPT, I don't know).
What Bush is guilty of is completely ignoring NK (other than calling it's leader a pygmy and lumping NK in the Axis).
When he did get around to trying to negotiate, what did he come up with?
Why almost exactly the same plan the right has been killing Clinton for.
In sum, I'll half agree with Dean, and almost completely agree with Kerry.
Current Events » in reply to Well, I don't see you as Chairman of the DNC either.
Your question
The whole thread (33 posts)
- North Korea Admits Having Nuclear Weapons
- Wow. That was fast.
- re: Wow. That was fast. Maybe they are going to reconcile the U235 program, which never stopped?
- I refer the honorable genteleman
- BTW...
- Really?
- They are hoping to get more attention with this non-news. (n/t)
- Wow. That was fast.