I suspect if the Earth did not have a large moon then it would be a waterworld. I also suspect that most Earthlike world's in the universe are waterworlds.
What disturbs me most about the various SETI arguments is the total absence of ET artifacts. Where's that equivalent of ET's empty beer can or cigarrete butt that was being worshipped by Ancient Egyptians or the Maya Indians? The Arabs most holy object is a common iron-nickle meteorite. The Ancient Greeks and Romans built several cult centers around ordinary meteorites. The total lack of ET artifacts makes me believe that ET has not sent anything to the Earth's surface in the last 10,000 years. Are we so boring that ET isn't interested in studying us? A more reasonable conclusion is that ET does not come calling except in million year intervals (there are probably ET artifacts in deep space that look like very small asteroids). That leads me to believe that ET is rare and infrequently dispersed in the galaxy.
Gary
Space/Science » in reply to re: Given the failure of SETI...
More agreement than disagreement
The whole thread (48 posts)
- A simple attempt at conveying the scale of the universe...
- Circular universe, or infinite universe, escape velocity?
- re: A simple attempt at conveying the scale of the universe...
- I'll raise you one...
- Stupendous. (n/t)
- re: Ultra Deep Field!; I'll raise you one more...(500 KB) my wallpaper
- The Hubble Deep Field
- I have heard....
- Pass the salt...
- Playing Powers of Ten...
- re: Playing Powers of Ten...
- Zaphod Beeblebrox
- habitable zones
- Given the failure of SETI...
- re: Given the failure of SETI...
- We humans haven't explored nearly enough yet for the definitive answer to alien life
- Given the failure of SETI...
- Carboxy chauvanism...
- habitable zones
- "It's all there for me."
- You 'one upped' me
- I'm going to go up and lay face down on my bed now, with a firm grip on the edges. (n/t)
