Adam,
Yes, I agree 100% The sooner the better.
Its safer for the Earth and it will ensure that any life you find IS from Mars, not field contamination from the Earth. You are proably too young to remember the fuss about water being found in the Apollo samples until it was determined to be water from Earth that contaminated the samples during recovery. And if life IS found it allows for quick follow-up on the discovery that will prove its from Mars rather then waiting years and years as with a sample return.
Rather them waste funds on a questionable Mars Sample Return the money would be far better spent on sending human to Mars. Or on missions that prepare the way.
I believe that the folks pushing for a Mars Sample Reurrn have basically given up on humans ever going to Mars. Even worst they are undermining the best reason for it.
Space/Science » in reply to Actually...
re: Actually...
The whole thread (50 posts)
- Back contamination problem update
- Sounds like NASA wants money and time to study a non issue.
- re: Back contamination problem update
- To Boldly Go...
- re: To Boldly Go...
- The people most concerned about Back Contamination seem to be very ignorant on the subject...
- re: The people most concerned about Back Contamination seem to be very ignorant on the subject...
- re: To Boldly Go...
- re: To Go like a real Fool...
- The people most concerned about Back Contamination seem to be very ignorant on the subject...
- where no rover has gone before
- re: To Boldly Go...
