OK to shake someone's hand. Not OK to kill someone.
OK to donate (legal amounts of) money to a campaign fund. Not OK to buy a congressman a house.
OK for a congressman to think good thoughts about contributers at voting time, and to vote any way they want. Not OK to introduce special clauses into bills that benefit no one but said contributers.
There seems to be clear evidence of fraud on Abramoff's part. They seem to be cutting a deal with him. That makes it seem like he can testify against bigger fish than himself. That's just the way it usually works. We will see how it pans out.
Whatever deal he cuts will not protect him from the civil court cases that - I guarantee you - will follow.
Current Events » in reply to How is a campaign contribution different from a bribe?
The law attempts to delineate between that which is ok, from that which is punishably bad.
The whole thread (35 posts)
- Democrats driving off another cliff?
- re: Nah... Just diving into a dumpster.
- I think the NSA actions are justified
- Nah, just straw men
- Why didn't they ask
- re More of your straw people. We also support legal use of wiretaps. (n/t)
- Abramoff is Republican. So are Frist, DeLay, Lay, etc.
- And about half of the money Abramoff went to Democrats like Patrck Kennedy and Harry Reid...
- Abramoff has some pretty heavy duty connections
- Story is not about campaign contributions.
- How is a campaign contribution different from a bribe?
- It's Abramoff's connections to the Office of the President, money laundering of international drug smuggling and it's connections with the Mob
- The law attempts to delineate between that which is ok, from that which is punishably bad.
- Just for you, the Abramoff primer
- Its the same old story.
- How is a campaign contribution different from a bribe?
- And about half of the money Abramoff went to Democrats like Patrck Kennedy and Harry Reid...
- re: Democrats driving off another cliff?
