re: Democrats driving off another cliff?

Current Events » in reply to Democrats driving off another cliff?

re: Democrats driving off another cliff?

Laurie Street — 12/29/2005 2:50:45 AM (archived)

The poll looks to be about whether or not the NSA should be able to wiretap. I thought the issue was all about the requirement of judicial approval of wiretaps. Is this a smokescreen? I don't understand why Americans are not ALL outraged at this blatant violation of judicial oversight.

The whole thread (35 posts)

Democrats driving off another cliff? - Tom Brosz - 12/29/2005 1:46:21 AM
- re: Nah... Just diving into a dumpster. - Scott Evil - 12/30/2005 6:10:30 AM
- I think the NSA actions are justified - SteveS - 12/29/2005 8:16:41 PM
  - You just don't get it, do you? - Lindy - 12/29/2005 10:12:35 PM
    - Well, I sure don't get that! - SteveS - 12/29/2005 10:53:02 PM
      - What vote? (n/t) - Lindy - 12/29/2005 11:18:10 PM
  - Where do you get the connection between this NSA kerfluffle... - alcaray - 12/29/2005 8:35:22 PM
    - re: connection - Tom Brosz - 12/29/2005 10:52:21 PM
    - You yahoo'n me again ;-) - SteveS - 12/29/2005 10:25:22 PM
      - Yeh, I was. To you and Tom, both... - alcaray - 12/29/2005 11:20:32 PM
        
        Oversight - Tom Brosz - 12/30/2005 4:42:05 AM
        
        Don't think you know what oversight means, in regards warrants (n/t) - alcaray - 12/30/2005 6:30:23 AM
        
        Fortunately, the Left doesn't get to set the parameters. - Tom Brosz - 12/30/2005 9:15:01 PM
        
        Thanks - SteveS - 12/30/2005 12:33:01 AM
- Nah, just straw men - Robert - 12/29/2005 6:46:26 PM
- Why didn't they ask - alcaray - 12/29/2005 4:54:36 PM
- re More of your straw people. We also support legal use of wiretaps. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 12/29/2005 3:16:36 PM
- Abramoff is Republican. So are Frist, DeLay, Lay, etc. - Bowser - 12/29/2005 1:59:25 PM
  - And about half of the money Abramoff went to Democrats like Patrck Kennedy and Harry Reid... - Larry J - 12/29/2005 3:10:55 PM
    - Abramoff has some pretty heavy duty connections - Lindy - 12/29/2005 10:33:08 PM
    - Story is not about campaign contributions. - alcaray - 12/29/2005 5:00:20 PM
      - How is a campaign contribution different from a bribe? - Larry J - 12/29/2005 7:04:53 PM
        
        It's Abramoff's connections to the Office of the President, money laundering of international drug smuggling and it's connections with the Mob - Lindy - 12/29/2005 10:39:25 PM
        
        The law attempts to delineate between that which is ok, from that which is punishably bad. - alcaray - 12/29/2005 8:11:18 PM
        
        re: The law attempts to delineate between that which is ok, from that which is punishably bad. - Lindy - 12/29/2005 11:23:25 PM
        
        Don't need to resort to frightingly cruddy sources like that, to know that Abramoff is a real bad apple. - alcaray - 12/29/2005 11:39:08 PM
        
        "Frightingly cruddy sources like that....." - Lindy - 12/30/2005 5:41:38 PM
        
        If I defecate upon Brosz's Newsmax, then I am honor bound to do the same to your Madcow. - alcaray - 12/30/2005 6:32:16 PM
        
        Just for drill... - Tom Brosz - 12/30/2005 9:17:12 PM
        
        Just for you, the Abramoff primer - Tony - 12/29/2005 7:40:05 PM
        
        Its the same old story. - Scott Evil - 12/29/2005 7:09:17 PM
        
        "Its those darn rich people and evil corporations! always trying to buy influence" - Lindy - 12/29/2005 10:44:10 PM
- re: Democrats driving off another cliff? - Laurie Street - 12/29/2005 2:50:45 AM
  - it is obviously a much more complicated issue than the Democrats want the US public to believe. - Scott Evil - 12/29/2005 2:32:54 PM
  - Poll - Tom Brosz - 12/29/2005 4:08:15 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (35 posts)