Scott, I don't hang with the tree huggers. They really make up a very small segment of society. The democrats, libertarians, and free thinkers I know in life are a formidable bunch. They all lead respectable lives and don't congregate out in the wilderness in survivalist outfits but you wouldn't want them as enemies. And by the way, their kids don't stagnate watching video games any more than the kids of parents of any other political persuasion.
It'd be an interesting fight between healthy, active liberals and centrists and the stereotypical fat rightist bully that's used to paying to have someone else do the dirty work for him. I got to see a bit of that back in my high school days only then it was the hippies and the cowboys. When backed into a corner the hippies often quickly gave up their peaceful personas and turned into raging beasts dispatching the slow-witted, alcohol drenched rednecks.
Art
Flame » in reply to A revolution requires revelutionaries.
re: A revolution requires revelutionaries.
The whole thread (38 posts)
- A bit pissed today
- Pissed as in "avin' a few pints o' tha bitters down a' tha local", pissed? (n/t)
- For God's sake, don't anyone tell him about Air America and New York. (n/t)
- Sounds like a great way to make money
- Awwwwww. The commie libs sold out to the rich Christians...
- Heh, heh.
- Is that last part a threat?
- The threat right now is rhetorical
- Typical: "competition" = "crushed by money"
- Then again, I could be wrong about nobody going "Billy Jack."
- Don't let it get you down
