Space/Science » in reply to That's $333/mth for insurance, a full one-third more than I would have to pay

The whole thread (42 posts)

• Alternative fuels - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2006 6:21:43 AM
  • Liquid coal - SteveS - 4/28/2006 1:46:53 AM
  • re: Alternative fuels - Sawyer - 4/26/2006 2:51:57 PM
    • re: Alternative fuels - JimO - 4/26/2006 3:08:41 PM
  • Insurance costs more than gas - SDF - 4/26/2006 10:06:51 AM
    • $250 a month for insurance! Where do you live? Iraq? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2006 3:15:22 PM
      • That's nothing - SDF - 4/26/2006 5:24:03 PM
        • What have you got for a damage deductible? Keep that high. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2006 6:01:46 PM
          • Find me an all-season, all-weather vehicle that costs less than $100/mth, all costs included - SDF - 4/26/2006 10:55:28 PM
            • Nothing useful in all weather is going to be that cheap. - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2006 1:20:31 AM
        • Geez... - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2006 6:01:02 PM
        • re: That's nothing - Lance - 4/26/2006 5:26:46 PM
          • In Australia - nick hoffman - 4/27/2006 10:26:07 PM
          • That's $333/mth for insurance, a full one-third more than I would have to pay (n/t) - SDF - 4/26/2006 5:31:29 PM
            • Actually, $333/mth US converts to $375/mth Canadian, that's 1.5-times what I would have to pay (n/t) - SDF - 4/26/2006 5:37:08 PM
  • re: Alternative fuels - nick hoffman - 4/26/2006 8:57:56 AM
    • re: Alternative fuels - Lance - 4/26/2006 5:19:21 PM
      • re: Alternative fuels - ljk - 4/26/2006 5:38:09 PM
        • re: Alternative fuels - Lance - 4/26/2006 6:16:42 PM
        • re: Alternative fuels - Tom Brosz - 4/26/2006 6:15:50 PM
          • re: Alternative fuels - ljk - 4/26/2006 6:25:54 PM
            • Quantum energy - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2006 1:22:08 AM
              • 5 x 10^113 J/m^3 - Adam - 4/27/2006 12:12:12 PM
                • enough Worlds??? - Adam - 4/27/2006 10:53:24 PM
                  • Only the lowest energy state is manifested (i.e. Ours) - SDF - 4/28/2006 2:52:12 AM
                    • :) Can you back this up? (n/t) - R.L. - 4/29/2006 6:52:15 AM
                      • Which part? Why cars rust? - SDF - 4/30/2006 4:20:35 AM
                        • Prove it.... - R.L. - 4/30/2006 5:10:01 AM
    • What about burning carbon dust? - REB - 4/26/2006 5:15:18 PM
      • We have laws against perpetual motion machines. (n/t) - alcaray - 4/27/2006 4:09:24 PM
        • Not a perpetual motion machine. There is energy input to get the carbon from the CO2 - REB - 4/27/2006 5:18:09 PM
          • re: Not a perpetual motion machine. There is energy input to get the carbon from the CO2 - alcaray - 4/27/2006 9:05:54 PM
            • re: Not a perpetual motion machine. There is energy input to get the carbon from the CO2 - REB - 4/28/2006 12:06:55 PM
              • rREb, you are wrong about the energy imbalance of refining - nick hoffman - 4/29/2006 6:46:57 AM
            • To be fair - nick hoffman - 4/27/2006 10:22:08 PM
      • No... - R.L. - 4/27/2006 8:13:44 AM
        • You are essentially advocating 'burning' CO2 to create CO2 - R.L. - 4/27/2006 8:21:15 AM
          • Conservation of energy? We put more energy into finding, getting, transporting and refining oil than we get out of it by burning it in our cars. - REB - 4/27/2006 1:00:27 PM
      • Try this link. - REB - 4/26/2006 5:17:22 PM
        • One more time - REB - 4/26/2006 5:19:31 PM
    • Milestone Achieved in the Development of Biological Fuel Cells - ljk - 4/26/2006 2:28:22 PM
      • The End of Oil? - ljk - 4/27/2006 2:00:51 PM