re: Why? I don't buy the assumption.

Space/Science » in reply to Why? I don't buy the assumption.

re: Why? I don't buy the assumption.

Chris Vancil — 8/29/2006 8:38:46 PM (archived)

This only tell me how little time you have taken to look at ISS assembly and what is inside.

Science Racks are designed to return because the STS could do it. Now with the STS ending service they can't return. It means science will be left behind or someone else will simply come up with a craft for return.

The whole thread (37 posts)

Once the STS system is cancelled, how will large segments be transported to ISS? - carl - 8/28/2006 10:17:22 PM
- Hopefully all the heavy lift for ISS will be done first. - Doug Ellison - 8/28/2006 10:36:31 PM
  - re: There will always be heavy equipment to return to Earth so that doesn't work. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/29/2006 7:24:35 AM
    - Why? I don't buy the assumption. - Sawyer - 8/29/2006 12:38:37 PM
      - re: Why? I don't buy the assumption. - Chris Vancil - 8/29/2006 8:38:46 PM
        
        I also get tired of lamely designing things so only the shuttle can do it... - Sawyer - 8/30/2006 1:46:08 AM
        
        The shuttle concept is vital to a robust space infrastructure. - Lee - 8/30/2006 5:43:55 AM
        
        bringing back what? - Doug Ellison - 8/30/2006 7:34:16 AM
        
        Well... - Lee - 8/30/2006 10:12:08 AM
        
        Disagree completely - Sawyer - 8/31/2006 7:22:16 AM
        
        Bringing stuff back would be free. - Lee - 8/31/2006 8:10:01 AM
        
        Hardly free - Doug Ellison - 8/31/2006 10:32:35 AM
        
        A shuttle type vehicle is what we were discussing. - Lee - 8/31/2006 2:51:22 PM
        
        LOL, they have minimal crew, have cut science, and it is yet to be seen whether they even get ISS built... - Sawyer - 8/30/2006 1:38:11 AM
        
        re: ATV - Raoul - 8/29/2006 9:07:10 PM
    - I didn't say it was great. - Doug Ellison - 8/29/2006 7:46:41 AM
      - Do it the MIR / Skylab way - nick hoffman - 8/29/2006 1:01:39 PM
      - re: I also didn't say you did. The real problem is the downhill leg of the journey. Non of the solutions right now take that in to consideration. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 8/29/2006 8:24:08 AM
        
        the downhill leg of the journey - Doug Ellison - 8/29/2006 8:46:25 AM
        
        re: the downhill leg of the journey - Chris Vancil - 8/29/2006 8:25:39 PM
        
        re: the downhill leg of the journey - Doug Ellison - 8/29/2006 9:02:20 PM
        
        That's where vision is required. - Lee - 8/30/2006 7:09:08 PM
        
        re: the downhill leg of the journey - Chris Vancil - 8/30/2006 10:04:04 AM
        
        Rack return not required... - Doug Ellison - 8/30/2006 10:36:58 AM
        
        re: Rack return not required... - Chris Vancil - 8/30/2006 7:48:59 PM
        
        re: Rack return not required... - Doug Ellison - 8/30/2006 9:39:33 PM
        
        There is interesting work being done on ballutes and inflatable heat shields. - alcaray - 8/31/2006 4:12:26 PM
        
        re: the downhill leg of the journey - Doug Ellison - 8/30/2006 10:32:53 AM
        
        re: the downhill leg of the journey - Chris Vancil - 8/30/2006 7:53:29 PM
        
        Solor Arrays for 1 - carl - 8/29/2006 4:09:09 PM
        
        re:They would deorbit them and let Solar Panels burn up. - Chris Vancil - 8/29/2006 8:28:09 PM
        
        no plans for replacement. - Doug Ellison - 8/29/2006 4:19:52 PM
        
        Even if Mechanical Damage or Debris hits? - carl - 8/29/2006 5:07:06 PM
        
        There are no replacement parts - Doug Ellison - 8/29/2006 8:14:52 PM
        
        ISS under Warranty? - carl - 8/29/2006 8:31:15 PM
  - Not at the rate they're going - Tom Brosz - 8/29/2006 5:26:23 AM
    - re: Not at the rate they're going - Doug Ellison - 8/29/2006 8:53:03 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (37 posts)