Current Events » in reply to Why we are having this discussion

The whole thread (41 posts)

• So here is a bit of nastiness - alcaray - 10/7/2006 8:02:48 PM
  • And on those out there defending perversion... - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 9:52:43 PM
    • Cut to the chase. - RNE - 10/9/2006 2:28:17 AM
      • re: Cut to the chase. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 2:43:35 AM
        • Hastert is two heart-beats away from the presidency. - alcaray - 10/9/2006 5:10:21 PM
        • re: Cut to the chase. - Robert - 10/9/2006 3:51:39 PM
          • Fly on the wall - azstrummer - 10/9/2006 11:56:20 PM
        • My god. this is insane. - MadYeti - 10/9/2006 2:31:39 PM
          • "I don't care about..." - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 5:29:25 PM
            • re: "I don't care about..." - YetiKnight - 10/9/2006 5:51:21 PM
          • Why we are having this discussion - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 5:21:43 PM
            • Is the "moral indignation being marshalled by the" Republicans also "fake"? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/9/2006 5:29:18 PM
              • oh, of course not - RightWingYeti - 10/9/2006 5:52:30 PM
          • Aren't we being a bit dramatic - FrankC - 10/9/2006 4:42:01 PM
            • not really. - YetiCratic Party Chairman - 10/9/2006 5:01:20 PM
              • splitting hairs - FrankC - 10/9/2006 5:43:06 PM
                • Ah yes. Here is where I get lectured by you Frank - YetiCratic chairman - 10/9/2006 5:58:01 PM
                  • rlimitations in that respect - FrankC - 10/9/2006 6:42:13 PM
                    • re: rlimitations in that respect - Yeti - 10/9/2006 6:55:24 PM
                      • testy, testy (n/t) - FrankC - 10/9/2006 7:34:04 PM
                        • What was the discussion on Geek? Whats the plurl of that? - Yeti, Yeti - 10/9/2006 7:56:17 PM
        • Studds is not in Congress now. - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 12:29:05 PM
          • Without a doubt. (n/t) - FrankC - 10/9/2006 4:44:42 PM
    • "...the dirty little sluts had it coming." - alcaray - 10/7/2006 11:57:12 PM
      • That is as disgusting as I've seen in a long, long time. - Bowser - 10/8/2006 1:14:07 AM
      • "Sixteen year olds may have heard about sex from evil liberal teachers, or may have even heard about it from the children of liberal parents." - alcaray - 10/8/2006 1:07:45 AM
      • You've got a blogger on "Blogspot." I quoted "The Nation." Want to try again? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2006 12:07:15 AM
        • OK you made me read it - alcaray - 10/8/2006 12:45:54 AM
          • And at least the "Nation" is a real source. Yours was apparently a satire. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2006 5:36:52 AM
            • I would be more not less worried if I sounded like a satire (n/t) - alcaray - 10/8/2006 7:13:39 AM
              • Satyr? (n/t) - ;-) - 10/8/2006 4:36:30 PM
    • Yadda yadda yadda. Another attempt to reframe the issue. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2006 10:54:44 PM
    • Talk to me, buddy. I'm right here. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/7/2006 10:10:08 PM
  • re: So here is a bit of nastiness - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 8:42:22 PM
    • So, it's OK for an adult to act irresponsibly if egged on by a teenager. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2006 9:06:10 PM
    • Well my post wasn't about "Republicans", but about a specific thing that someone said - alcaray - 10/7/2006 8:55:51 PM
      • re: Well my post wasn't about "Republicans", but about a specific thing that someone said - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 9:32:13 PM
        • Can you see why I might misconstrue... - alcaray - 10/7/2006 9:51:44 PM
          • The "topic" is media control of the narrative. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 10:43:46 PM
            • Can't I just bring up a small-town newspaper story and have that be the topic? - alcaray - 10/7/2006 11:09:22 PM
    • I agree. Can't expect much from a 54 y/o Republican Congressman. - Bowser - 10/7/2006 8:47:50 PM