So I hope you'll forgive me for not discussing the red herring of what's the matter with Democrats.
That specific thing that someone said made the direct implication that the content of Foley's email (did he mean IM?) was because of encouragement from the receiver(s) of the email/IM. Even if it was, does that excuse what was in Foley's communication? In any way whatsoever????
What if it wasn't some kid on loan to the HoR? What if it wasn't a group of kids on loan pretending to be one kid on loan? What if instead it was the FBI or DC police doing a sting?
You should be more careful of what kind of behavior you defend. (Note that this comment is also about something specific that specifically someone said.)
Current Events » in reply to re: So here is a bit of nastiness
Well my post wasn't about "Republicans", but about a specific thing that someone said
The whole thread (41 posts)
- So here is a bit of nastiness
- And on those out there defending perversion...
- Cut to the chase.
- "...the dirty little sluts had it coming."
- Yadda yadda yadda. Another attempt to reframe the issue.
- Talk to me, buddy. I'm right here. (n/t)
- re: So here is a bit of nastiness
- And on those out there defending perversion...
