How many of your posts, over quite a few years, have involved outrage about the damage--ANY damage--our military causes in the process of fighting the wars we're in? Someone should take a count. Long before Iraq, it was you who threw up most of the posts on the awful things our troops were doing in Afghanistan.
Keep in mind the tactics we used to win WWII.
In comparison, our military in recent years has been a model of restraint, costing more American lives to save lives in other countries. But that isn't really relevant, since there are NO tactics they could use that would meet with your approval. You see, you're not actually on their side.
Current Events » in reply to "Other than not winning the Iraq war as quickly as they were supposed to, - - "
As if you would have supported "overwhelming force."
The whole thread (39 posts)
- Military publications: "Rumsfeld must go"
- Department of Defense responds:
- Wasting a reply on the homegrown insurgency
- No reaction from the Right?
- re: No reaction from the Right?
- "The opinion of the mainstream military"
- re: No reaction from the Right?
- Looks as if the only True Believers left are in the WH and here.
- LOL, good one Bowser (n/t)
- The editorial
