Where Bush created more support and havens for them. That's simple. Iraq and Afghanistan.
Refute that. Deny that al-Qaeda controls large areas of Iraq, whereas before it didn't have an existence there except in the imaginations of a few "imaginers". Deny that the Taliban controls more of Afghanistan than does the central government or NATO.
Motivating terrorists. "Collateral" damage, torture, etc.
Deny that killing and torturing one's friends and relatives motivates terrorists. Let's hear the reasoning.
Bush wanted to be a war president, and invaded an innocent third-world country to be so. Deny that Saudis, not Iraqis, but Saudis, not Afghanis, flew the planes into WTC.
Iraq has been destroyed as a nation and as a state. And the US is widely hated in the former country, and cannot put it back together. Especially with more troops.
Deny that.
I'm sure you can do it. Not rationally, not with anything based in reality, but with the same imagination that said it would be a cakewalk, that Iraq could rebuild itself, and that Bush had A Plan.
Somehow calling fantasies not real, pointing out reality, dealing with issues rationally has become "spewing" in your mind. Deny that, too.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to You're just randomly spewing now. Try and organize your thoughts.
Point by point. Where are the Taliban and al-Qaeda strongest?
The whole thread (31 posts)
- Democrats again call for immediate and unconditional surrender.
- Now wait a second!
- Surrender?
- Bush has had longer than WWII. Iraq had 23 million people, no air force, no navy.
- I'd love to see your definition of "counter-terror" too.
- Incidentally...
