about "www.geocraft.com" and it's authors, the Mssrs Hieb.
Begin quote:
*******************************************************************
<<Monte Hieb has worked as chief engineer for the West Virginia Office of Miner’s Safety. I hope you understand that the coal mining industry is not a reliable source for debate on climate change. Clearly, Monte Hieb is not a climate scientist (though he seems to be an enthusiastic amateur fossil-hound with a really nice web site on W VA fossils.
Here is Monte Hieb on water vapor. http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
Here are real scientists on water vapor. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142 (hat tip to Felix Salmon at RGE Monitor)
Look, I'm not trying to embarrass you. I'm seriously concerned that you and so many other otherwise well informed folk can be led astray on such an important matter when the stakes are so high.
Please read real science in peer reviewed journals. There is too much at stake
Posted by: Bupa | Thursday, November 02, 2006 at 06:19 PM>>
***************************************************
End quote.
The preceding quote is from a lengthy debate on
http://neweconomist.blogs.com/new_economist/2006/10/stern_review_2.html
Now, can we talk about something else? This is just debate by Google, you can prove anything you want on the Web, and this is getting really tiresome.
Space/Science » in reply to Not only logical and witty...
Why am I not surprised?
The whole thread (53 posts)
- Greenhouse Gas not behaving
- re: Greenhouse Gas not behaving
- re: 4) The climate models are unreliable
- You enjoy sweltering in 50 celsius temperatures, Nick? (n/t)
- Getting a little excited about a Guardian science article, aren't you?
- re: Greenhouse Gas not behaving
- No
- Maybe
- If one doesn't understand something...
- re: Maybe
- Maybe not.
- re: Maybe not.
- re: Maybe not.
- re: Maybe not.
- I must withdraw...
- re: Maybe not.
- re: Maybe not.
- re: Maybe not.
- Maybe not.
- Maybe
- No
