Care to address the issue?
The proposition I am expected to accept is that all the skeptics are "on the take," while the others involved in this controversy, particularly those writing the aforementioned summary, have no agenda.
Who funds the IPCC? The World Meteorological Organization? Who pays for the publications, the travel, the various sessions that take place all over the world?
If you bitch about the AEI, you can't ignore the other side of the issue, either.