True re Cummins, but so far in that case its mostly inference.
In Lam's case, it's 100% clear from their own documents that she was at the top of the list for DoJ/White House, and the remarks about "special problems" and such, timing of concerns being linked to developments in her GOP corruption cases as opposed any obvious or stated immigration concern, etc. that seem really damning.
There's another exchange where Sampson wonders if anyone has "woodshedded" her on immigration -- "anyone? anyone?" he asks. While that could reflect concerns over immigration, could also be a CYA -- is the immigration concern plausible. Given the letter to Feinstein saying Lam was doing fine on immigration, that seems fishy. Connected to thatexcahnge is another email where Sampson wonders about some logistical details of possibly sending extra prosecutors to the S.D. district to deal with immigration cases, the "premise" -- his word, not mine -- the "premise" being that AG AG ordered more attention to immigration cases in that district.
Conclusive, no, but from my own quick scan of the documents in Lam's case is NOT just a suspicious correlation -- the docs show plenty of grounds for digging deeper.
Current Events » in reply to And Harry Cummins was investigating a Republican Govenor for corruption...
True, but not as documented as for Lam
The whole thread (58 posts)
- US. Attny firings issue runs deeper than even I suspected
- AG AG just had a press conference
- Also: if the removals were: "perfectly appropriate and within our discretion" ...
- Okay, you lost me.
- Any Clinton fired had to be replaced by someone confirmed by congress
- Gonzales admits he made mistakes, but TB knows better, right?
- Please read the following link....
- Heh, heh. Let's put the "cute" back into "prosecute".
- Clinton fired em all, or maybe it was Reno asserting her authority
- re: Okay, you lost me.
- re: Okay, you lost me.
- You're blithering.
- You are the one with no clue...
- Look up Jay B. Stephens. (n/t)
- Are you SERIOUSLY going to try to defend this?
- P.S. Add another 20 days to the "no tinfoil comments" ban
- and look how well that turned out for rostenkowski.....
- And this is relevant in what way?
- Look up Jay B. Stephens. (n/t)
- Cute answer! Completely devoid of substance, but Cute!
- Background
- Lets run yet another list
- the rightist talking point is that everyone fires their US attorneys all the time
- Background
- You are the one with no clue...
- PS
- You're blithering.
