...Or not.
I appreciate the lecture on Evolution, but nowhere did I say that Evolution is: "intelligent", "perfect", or "directed".
However, if the foreskin was such a horrible liability, we would see more obvious infection rates with it 'in the wild' (which we don't), and we would be able to establish clear benefits from the data (which we can't) that clearly point to foreskin elimination as advantageous.
Good god, folks, we have 3 billion males living on earth in all sorts of cultural contexts with or without foreskins. If we can't isolate clear benefits of circumcision with this much 'dangling data', then I suggest that there probably are no clear benefits. In that case, we are only doing it out of tribal voodoo.
Yeti