Off Topic — HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to re: Uh...

re: Uh...

I realize this was not your study, nor your sampling methods. And I perused her website as much as I could tolerate it. The paper about the iron particles was absolute silliness. I can't even begin to describe it. I've no interest in talking to her outside this forum.

What I'm talking about is your investigations. If you want to do science on these things then you need to be very rigorous about your sample collection. That is step one. And it is what I never see on these links you provide. What I see are people interested in conclusions, not the data, nor how it is collected. Sample collection is a more complicated matter than just grabbing one inside and one outside. Ideally you need a traverse at two perpendicular axis, an extended orthagonal grid, random points, a standard or two, and a system of anti-bias to sample number assignment.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (79 posts)