I realize this was not your study, nor your sampling methods. And I perused her website as much as I could tolerate it. The paper about the iron particles was absolute silliness. I can't even begin to describe it. I've no interest in talking to her outside this forum.
What I'm talking about is your investigations. If you want to do science on these things then you need to be very rigorous about your sample collection. That is step one. And it is what I never see on these links you provide. What I see are people interested in conclusions, not the data, nor how it is collected. Sample collection is a more complicated matter than just grabbing one inside and one outside. Ideally you need a traverse at two perpendicular axis, an extended orthagonal grid, random points, a standard or two, and a system of anti-bias to sample number assignment.
Off Topic » in reply to re: Uh...
re: Uh...
The whole thread (79 posts)
- THIS should be WORLD NEWS, yet hardly a peep from the press
- Crop Art (most incredible)
- For your viewing pleasure
- Thank You so much, Lindy
- The aliens are not here for all of us
- Who says they're "aliens"?
- Another sign of pseudoscience
- Who says they're "aliens"?
- The aliens are not here for all of us
- They are playthings scattered on the nursery carpet to train us to play with the big boys (n/t)
- It probably will make world news soon...
- "very strange design"
- So I say to all you nay-sayers.....
- "It is time to listen to all the people who have been looking at this phenomenon for so many years."
- My call...
- Military operations
- Same field last year.... Military operations
- Better.
- Why does he refer to it as a ball of light?
- re: Why does he refer to it as a ball of light?
- more likely the frauds are in collusion with the frauds (n/t)
- Where's ER when you need him?
- "DVD" my hat.
- Same field last year.... Military operations
- Military operations
- Crop Art (most incredible)
