Off Topic — HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to re: Uh...

Ugh
Lindy — (archived)

>"I perused her website as much as I could tolerate it".

So, does that mean you read the XRD study, or not?
Obviously not.
That you looked at the swollen and exploded nodes or twisted seed heads versus controls, or not?

>" The paper about the iron particles was absolute silliness."

The Meteoric Iron paper was written by Levengood & Burke, and it was published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which is the method used by all scientists to get their work out.
Now why should I trust the name of anonymous poster who can't show me his vitae over someone I've known for years who's dedicated and has shown some of the most remarkable differences in circled wheat?

>"And it is what I never see on these links you provide. What I see are people interested in conclusions, not the data, nor how it is collected."

That's a nice way of rolling up the whole phenomena and dismissing it. There's so much more at the site if you would READ it. Chances are you came across something that didn't fit into your nice preconceived notions of how things should be. I am not really dissing you, but to have you throw a taunt back that you can't "tolerate" it, then maybe you shouldn't be commenting on it at all.

I have done extended studies myself with a tenured aerospace professor over the past 15 years and have hundreds of pages of analysis that stands up in court. But you wouldn't tolerate that either.

Continue being a skeptic. I'm done with this for now.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (79 posts)