Compared to the rest of the Royals, Diana was a loving, affectionate mother. She obviously spent some quality time with her sons. By contrast, Queen Elizabeth was raised by parents who were neither affectionate nor attentive. Charles was also raised that way. Say what you will, she loved those boys, and was saddled with a cold, unloving husband whose heart was elsewhere and had been before they were married. He married Diana to provide heirs and have a wife who could be Queen. Had he been affectionate and attentive, a bit understanding, their marriage might even have worked. But he wasn't and Diana was young. I wouldn't judge her too harshly. Unless you've walked in her shoes, you can't know what demons stalked her.
Well, yes you can, actually. They are called paparazzi, minions of Satan.
Flame » in reply to "Diana’s family recalls 'best mother in the world'"
It's all a matter of prespective
The whole thread (77 posts)
- "Diana’s family recalls 'best mother in the world'"
- Who really cares?
- It's all a matter of prespective
- Gee Bowser "Prince" Charles wasn't exactly the greatest father OR husband
- The whole famn damily is "off".
- A *Night* of passage?
- " A history of British royalty reads like the Conservative members of the US Congress"
- Ye mariners of England...
- re: " A history of British royalty reads like the Conservative members of the US Congress"
- I disagree with your opinion. but I support your right to hold an opinion
- You couldn't be any further off, oh sheltered Techster
- re: You couldn't be any further off, oh sheltered Techster
- Romantic love is as old as humanity
- It ain't just sex with some.
- "Sex without love is civilized man's natural state"
- The whole famn damily is "off".
- I think Harry is entitled to say that about his dead mother. (n/t)
- Blood's thicker than water....and logic (n/t)