Don't even see why this is an argument.
If someone gets satisfaction making hand-crafted limited products and earns enough doing it to satisfy his needs, more power to him.
If someone has the ambition to build factories and sell millions of products, more power to him, too.
I do need to point out that without any of the latter type, we're basically back to living in feudal times. Too many people don't realize what the Industrial Revolution really accomplished for the lower classes, having a somewhat foggy and romantic view of what "living off the land" is really like.
This is an awful lot to draw out of one commercial. A reasonable person might ask why two people with such opposing views of business were partners in the first place. In the real world, maybe they'd go their separate ways, each developing a successful endeavor on their own personal models.
Flame » in reply to So what's in it for them?
No "right" answer.
The whole thread (30 posts)
- No, that's not the whole idea.