That was when you trotted out the argument: "Well if we can't pass laws against sodomy, then we can't pass laws against incest or statutory rape." It happened in Texas, as I recall.
Also happening in Texas is the refutation of your (and Geoff's) prior argument that it's the leftys we have to thank for surveillance cameras. That was just the first right-wingish city that I could think of and it's the only one I looked up. Give me a (short) list of cities that you think are right-wing enough (chosen without prior knowledge of their camera status, now - no cheating!) to have a bearing on this argument, and I will show you how most or all of them have or are getting cameras too. Cameras appeal to law-and-order types.
Current Events » in reply to I don't know. Are there many cities where that is being done?
We debated it here.
The whole thread (42 posts)
- Cameras, Crooks, and Deterrence
- "Leniency to evil coupled with authoritarianism.....that is the Left"
- Numbers don't add up...
- And yet unconstitutional surveillance doesn't bother the neo-cons.
- re: Cameras, Crooks, and Deterrence
- Because American conservatives are so concerned about our right to privacy...
- Should be on Flame (n/t)
- "Leniency to evil coupled with authoritarianism- in brief summary, that is the Left."
- Oddly, I don't see it that way...
- re: "Leniency to evil coupled with authoritarianism- in brief summary, that is the Left."
- No big deal, Geoff ambushed me once on the Space board.
