They are talking in 10, 15 and 20 year time frames now. 'Then' it was 'I doubt 6 months' and out by October 2003.
Sure, there has been some change. The question is can we possibly hold it, or even push it, and at what cost, for how long? We have maxxed out what we can do, and the progress is shockingly small, and absurdly less than what was prmised or anticipated..
You know I think we are there, and should stay there for as long as it takes so that we can leave without genocide ensuing. That will be a time frame in decades.
I think you are missing the point of all of this. The point of all of this is, once again, we have underperformed estimates by absurd margins. Once again, you scream 'MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! BY GOD WE DID IT!!! GO TEAM!!!'
The point of this is that it doesn't even dawn on you how wrong you are compared to just even 6 months ago, much less years ago. Once again, most of the critics were right and once again, most of the CheerLeaderSquad you perform on were wrong. As Alcary said, I would drop 90 % of my commentary on this matter if you and anyone else would just for once admit how shockingly massively totally wrong you have been for years on Iraq. Some intellectual honesty would be refreshing, and I might just listen to you again instead of poke you with a stick and watch you crow about how perfect the world you helped bring about is.
Yeti
Current Events » in reply to Did you even bother to look at the data?
I'll tell you one thing thats changed.
The whole thread (25 posts)
- "Q: Can newly trained Iraqi forces handle those security problems?"
- re: newly trained? Not always well. The veterans? A lot better.
- Tom, Tom, Tom. The US has been "training" those people for 4 years.
- You have to understand you have no idea what you're talking about.
- You think we have to wait for an Iraqi Eisenhower now?
- re: You think we have to wait for an Iraqi Eisenhower now?
- I have to say I'm with Bowser on this one.
- re: "Your story has changed."
- I just enjoy observing the shields go up.
- I think the original point...
- For you, this is a "that was then, this is now" kind of thing, right?
- "Then" is pretty much all your side has got right now.
- For you, this is a "that was then, this is now" kind of thing, right?
- I think the original point...
- I just enjoy observing the shields go up.
- re: "Your story has changed."
- I have to say I'm with Bowser on this one.
- re: You think we have to wait for an Iraqi Eisenhower now?
- That is just plain nonsense. The same nonsense, over and over for years.
- You think we have to wait for an Iraqi Eisenhower now?
- You have to understand you have no idea what you're talking about.
- Tom, Tom, Tom. The US has been "training" those people for 4 years.
- re: newly trained? Not always well. The veterans? A lot better.
