You try to come across as a NeoFascist, but some of your posts are some of the most classic (even stereotypical) Marxist harangues I've ever read, even my cuz Robbie the Commie would have thought that last little broadside a bit over the top, even for him; evil, drooling capitalists manipulating global securities markets and media conglomerates on a vast arena...hmmm. Haven't heard that one in a long time.
Marxists tend to think in terms of socio/historical forces, not guys in frock coats and top hats twitching marionette strings on a global scale. That is soooo 19th century. Of course, some of the conservatives on this board do seem to be a bit fond of conspiracy theories, eh?
You're scary, Techie. I can't tell on who's side you're on.
Flame » in reply to Getting "Rich"
Are you a Red?
The whole thread (52 posts)
- The roots of liberal condescension
- A scandal in Bohemia
- The new world.
- Welcome back
- Probably liberal superiority. Makes sense. (n/t)
- The truth of Wilsonian statesmanship
- It was the title of the goddam article. (n/t)
- A suggestion Tom........
- Oooh, that reminds me, new Real Time with Bill Maher show tonight! (n/t)
- WSJ Op-ed page still extruding brown-gold I see...
- That's laughable coming from the right in general, and you in particular
- Check the folks and opinions printed in that edition of the WSJ.
- Lips get tired? (n/t)
- A scandal in Bohemia
