The Gospel According to DeMille
So you're telling me that the data is accurate in isolation, but that history, ideology, context and interpretation can mean that it can also support alternate, perhaps even contradictory, viewpoints?
If that's the case, why should we uncritically accept any of the references to any of the "facts" you dredge up from the Net to "prove" your points?
John 3:16, if it's in the Book, it must be true...or as Pharaoh used to say; "So let it be written, so let it be done."