...is the blissful joy and righteousness it affords its owner.

Climate change, as advertised, is so much bs. Every model concocted out incomplete data, science and comprehension. And all to shift wealth into the hands of some outsourcers who don't have to use pollution controls.

Watching the naive, scientifically illiterate fanatics here tilt at the windmills of "climate denial" is good for a laugh every year or so.

FTR here is a summary of the false data used repeatedly:

1)
We have no idea how much ice is retreating or growing. Surface ice means nothing since most of it is under the surface and isn't measured or weighed. A satellite picture means nothing-less than nothing. When you look at a glass with ice in it the surface measurement is useless.
Likewise we have no way to say the seas are rising or retreating. Undersea ice *expansion* can *both* raise the sea levels by expanding and pushing up water or cause them to retreat as the water is locked in ice. To point at any particular flood or ebb as a man-made climate change event is preposterous.

2)
We can't accurately tell the average temperature of the world right now. We don't take temperatures in enough places to get within 20-30 degrees of the actual number. Half a century ago we had dozens of official temp stations and a century earlier "farmers almanacs" and a handful of home-grown thermometers. Any statement of fact about the world being warmer or colder - at any time - is pure bullshit. No one has anything resembling a real number for 2017, 1980 or 1830. *All* those charts are pure unscientific crap for the rubes.

3)
Attribution of greenhouse gases to supposed temperature increases is more BS. Like kindergarteners, the assumption that a location in space should maintain the same climate is asinine. The magnetosphere migrates and with it an enormous electromagnetic field that reacts to sunlight. As the magnetosphere shifts and the depth and gauss of the field that reacts to sunlight changes over that "fixed location" - the temperature is going to change as well.

So if a "new high" is recorded in a location, even with our pathetically small temperature dataset, unless the shifting magnetosphere is taken into the account, the temperature derived is largely useless unless it happens within a very short timeframe.

4)
No current global warming model takes into account the warming of the earth from within. None. zip. nada. Our molten iron magma core receives a pulse beat from the solar magnetosphere and is what triggers our protective magnetosphere in the first place is what keeps earth from being a cinder block. But this magma change temperature just like our atmosphere does and our surface temperatures currently have *no* way of measuring any heat that is being conducted to the surface.

That magma *is* heating up areas all around the world. We have no idea how much that magma moves around or any models to estimate just how much impact it has on regional temperatures. We know it heats up the ocean floors and that heat of course is going to influence that wonderful ice measurement now, isn't it?

_____________________________________________

Yes, the climate scientists and their solutions to "climate change" are no better than the barbers who used leeches to drain the blood of a patient.

Nothing is more dangerous than letting fanatics with a small amount of information go off and try to save the world.

Five of those EPA scientists who don't know jackshit about science, were fired. And I was glad to have helped.