Everything has a context. It's all connected and depending upon how and where one looks at it from, an event can be interpreted as evil or good.
9//11 brought to forefront middle-eastern bad behavior and the all too real threat of terrorism at home. It was linked to the oil producing nations and the US presence there. Iraq was flagrantly anti-US and was the *only* nation whose leader *applauded* 9/11. When looking for a guilty party the one with a motive and the means will be the first suspect. Saddam's 9/11 response literally demanded US attention and investigation.
The overthrow of his regime and identifying an 'axis of evil' was not surprising or even unusual when seen with the proper context of events. Like a police department cracking down on crime, even if the one mob leader was not guilty this time, his removal and imprisonment are high on the 'to do' list.
Is life more free in Iraq now? Yes. Is it more dangerous? Yes. Will it eventually be viewed as a watershed moment in Iraqi history as regarding their freedom? Yes.
As for Obama...he wasn't co-opted he was planted. He's the personal puppet of the interests that picked him out in 2004, funded him and handed him his scripts and agenda. Should he abandon the scripts they hand him, he could end up like Kennedy - every beholden President knows this. He's an empty suit. Not a solid belief or real conviction anywhere inside of him. He's the stereotypical Chicago politician - bought and paid for to serve.
People recognize this now. His handlers created an image and sold it. The frustrated public bought it and the real problem was his opponent (McCain) was/is himself a corrupt sleazoid. So the people desperately *wanted* to believe in Obama and his PR slogan of change.
Follow the money. Soros and the billionaire cabal that want to bring down the west are on a roll. A billionaire can comfortably plant themselves anywhere and sabotage nations, buy elections and work towards fulfilling whatever large dreams have been denied to them. Fortunately, eventually the people realize when they have been duped and when someone doesn't improve their lot in life.
Flame » in reply to Re: Re: Please define "patriot" as you would say it
Re: Re: Re: Please define "patriot" as you would say it
The whole thread (56 posts)
- Is SDAI-TECH1 a member of the Illuminati?
- Re: Is SDAI-TECH1 a member of the Illuminati?
- Hey, I frequently get lit.
- No he has applied but so far
- Re: Is SDAI-TECH1 a member of the Illuminati?
- Re: Re: Is SDAI-TECH1 a member of the Illuminati?
- A "patriot" in today's day and age....
- Re: Re: Please define "patriot" as you would say it
- Re: Please define "patriot" as you would say it
- It is like pornography
- Please define "patriot" as you would say it
- I think the question was not so much an appeal for a dictionary definition...
- Re: patriot
- Ah, you mean a patriot is a collectivist.
- Sure.
- Re: Whatever
- Whatever
- Sure.
- Re: Re: Please define "patriot" as you would say it
- Re: Please define "patriot" as you would say it
- Brrrr.... n/t
- Re: Re: Is SDAI-TECH1 a member of the Illuminati?
- Isn't "illuminati"
- Who can blame him?
