Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to If you can't understand the big words

EP's Curious Data Heirarchy

EP,

While your reply provides ample support for the opinion many here have of your maturity, intellectual ability, and low ability to present rational arguments, it does nothing to address the fact that your supposed source did not evaluate the orbital option.

Another set of pictures about a Moon scope without any discussion of orbital options does even less to support your bogus comment about the Moon being the cheaper option than the text.

It is most curious how your recent data preference seems to be:

1) Pictures over text
2) Simplified (and obviously limited) reporter interpretations over detailed technical reports.

Seems kind of inverted to me. It is also curious to observe the amount of subjectivity involved in interpretation at each level.

This seems to parallel your preference for myth and legends over crater counts and NEO data.

Regards,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (51 posts)