Re: Excuse me, but . . .

Current Events » in reply to Re: Excuse me, but . . .

Re: Excuse me, but . . .

Tom Brosz — 8/2/2002 5:55:05 PM (archived)

Yeah, I mentioned driving under the influence specifically in the post he was responding to, but I'm getting used to people ignoring what I actually say in posts.

The whole thread (43 posts)

Ashcroft Says Terrorism-Drug Trafficking Link 'Shocking' . . . - D. Spires - 7/31/2002 7:37:15 PM
- Profits on illegal drugs - Tom Brosz - 7/31/2002 9:37:35 AM
  - Well, you don't expect the gov't to do it. - Bowser - 7/31/2002 12:54:34 PM
    - I would take issue with this part - alcaray - 8/1/2002 5:18:51 PM
      - Re: I'd say that experiment . . . - D. Spires - 8/1/2002 6:35:43 PM
        
        Of course you are right - alcaray - 8/1/2002 7:50:00 PM
        
        Re: Well, just don't mix cocane and sugar . . . - D. Spires - 8/1/2002 8:22:40 AM
        
        Have you ever tried the punch at a Mormon wedding? They don't need the cocaine. ~8^O n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 8/1/2002 9:06:38 AM
      - And you'd be right. - Bowser - 8/1/2002 5:24:59 PM
        
        Maybe, but... - Tom Brosz - 8/1/2002 6:33:23 PM
        
        No "maybe, but". - Bowser - 8/1/2002 6:54:17 PM
        
        Re: That was a 7% Solution . . . ;^) (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 8/1/2002 6:38:18 PM
    - Legalization - Tom Brosz - 7/31/2002 1:38:45 PM
      - Marijuana - Bowser - 7/31/2002 4:38:44 PM
        
        Re: Marijuana - Tom Brosz - 7/31/2002 5:26:34 PM
        
        It is interesting that the two agree on something like that. - ebnelson - 8/1/2002 12:13:39 PM
        
        Savage is indeed a Psycho Hose Beast - Tom Brosz - 8/1/2002 7:22:43 PM
        
        Well, showing indications of harmful effects is not that hard... - alcaray - 8/1/2002 4:53:50 PM
      - It should all be legal. Period. § (n/t) - ebnelson - 7/31/2002 3:14:42 PM
        
        Re: Then you might as well free the tobacco companies - SteveS - 7/31/2002 3:51:52 PM
        
        I doubt the doctor's opinions severely. - ebnelson - 8/1/2002 12:07:43 PM
        
        free the tobacco companies - Tom Brosz - 7/31/2002 4:34:37 PM
        
        Re: About jobs too - SteveS - 7/31/2002 5:16:00 PM
        
        Anyone on this bbs, and any of our kids could - ebnelson - 8/1/2002 3:24:15 PM
        
        Re: I'd have to agree . . . - D. Spires - 8/1/2002 3:32:00 PM
        
        Yes. Prohibition creates lots of jobs: - ebnelson - 8/1/2002 3:48:45 PM
        
        Re: They will still be around with legal drugs - SteveS - 8/1/2002 2:33:59 PM
        
        Re: The same can be said for other crimes, should we legalize them? - SteveS - 8/1/2002 2:11:29 PM
        
        Other crimes are not "victimless." - Tom Brosz - 8/1/2002 4:34:36 PM
        
        Re: Other crimes are not - SteveS - 8/1/2002 5:51:00 PM
        
        Re: Excuse me, but . . . - D. Spires - 8/2/2002 1:26:03 PM
        
        Re: Excuse me, but . . . - SteveS - 8/2/2002 6:22:59 PM
        
        Re: Excuse me, but . . . - Tom Brosz - 8/2/2002 5:55:05 PM
  - Re: Profits on illegal drugs - p - 7/31/2002 10:52:02 AM
- "Shocking", my foot. - Bowser - 7/31/2002 8:21:31 AM
  - Re: Reactionary . . . - D. Spires - 7/31/2002 9:33:25 AM
  - Re: CIA - Tom Brosz - 7/31/2002 9:27:20 AM
    - Tom, Tom, Tom........ - Do your homework - 7/31/2002 5:37:54 PM
    - Re: CIA - Bowser - 7/31/2002 1:36:43 PM
      - Re: CIA - Ignorance is Bliss - 7/31/2002 5:12:20 PM
        
        I submit before your detailed and insightful sources of information... - Tom Brosz - 7/31/2002 5:46:13 PM
      - Now you just confabulate. - ebnelson - 7/31/2002 3:13:29 PM
  - Re: - ebnelson - 7/31/2002 8:32:54 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (43 posts)