"And please do continue to ignore the very real Syria connection. It will help in all future fabrications regarding current WMD formerly located within the boundaries of Iraq."
Then post something ANYTHING factual to support this claim! Or am I supposed to take that on faith as well too, like a good little lackey of the current administration?
"Authorized UN sources†involve persons authorized to transmit information from the UN, not to the UN. Detectives are internal sources, not department/agency sources"
This is a degree of quibbling and digression that I thought you wer wholly incapable of. The sheer blatancy of it I think suggests something about your postion to anyone who can read.
"Of course it wouldn’t make any sense. That would require some form of sense on your part."
I am delighted to see that you go running into ad-hominems when your views are sufficiently challenged. This really lets me know what kind of person you are. Thanks!
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to re: The facts . . .
re: re: The facts . . .
The whole thread (39 posts)
- Pressure builds on U.S. to explain lack of Iraq weapons
- re: The Loser!
- The Winner!
- So...
- re: Lewinsky flap . . .
- Repeating lie doesn't make it the truth
- re: So...
- So...