"An assortment of lies."
As yet, I have not seen one solid piece of evidence showing deliberate lying (on the part of Bush or anyone else) about anything leading to the Iraq War. If you want to talk circumstantial evidence, and conjecture, let me know, and we can get back to the WMD discussion on that basis, too. Now, if you want to talk errors and misinterpretations, that would be something that could be legitimately debated.
Clinton, on the other hand, lied in his teeth, not only to a Grand Jury, but straight into the eyes of the American public. The fact that he could do this far outweighed the original transgression. If he could lie about that, he could lie about economics, the military, or anything else. It's kind of like seeing the president of your bank swipe a candy bar from a 7-11. The candy bar isn't the issue.
Current Events » in reply to So...
re: So...
The whole thread (39 posts)
- Pressure builds on U.S. to explain lack of Iraq weapons
- re: The Loser!
- The Winner!
- So...
- re: Lewinsky flap . . .
- Repeating lie doesn't make it the truth
- re: So...
- So...